Among the intellectual classes in the Eighteenth Century the agrarian myth had virtually universal appeal. The American farmer looked to the future alone, and the story of the American land became a study in futures. The master of a plantation, as the white male head of a slaveowning family was known, was to be a stern and loving father figure to his own family and the people he enslaved. The cotton that yeomen grew went primarily to the production of home textiles, with any excess cotton or fabric likely traded locally for basic items such as tools, sewing needles, hats, and shoes that could not be easily made at home or sold for the money to purchase such things. According to its defenders, slavery was a , Slaveholders even began to argue that Thomas Jeffersons assertions in the Declaration of Independence were wrong. The ideals of the agrarian myth were competing in his breast, and gradually losing ground, to another, even stronger ideal, the notion of opportunity, of career, of the self-made man. what vision of human perlcclion appears before us: Skinny, bony, sickly, hipless, thighless, formless, hairless, teethless. Slavery In The US Constitution . Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities will spring up again as if by magic; but destroy our farms, and the grass will grow in the streets of every city in the country. Out of the beliefs nourished by the agrarian myth there had arisen the notion that the city was a parasitical growth on the country. In Mississippi, yeoman farming culture predominated in twenty-three counties in the northwest and central parts of the state, all within or on the edges of a topographical region geographers refer to as the Upper Coastal Plain. It took a strong man to resist the temptation to ride skyward on lands that might easily triple or quadruple their value in one decade and then double in the next. And yet most non-slaveholding white Southerners. Oscar The Grouch Now A Part Of United Airlines C-Suite. why did they question the ideas of the declaration of independese. Like almost all good Americans he had innocently sought progress from the very beginning, and thus hastened the decline of many of his own values. But as critiques of slavery in the northern press increased in the 1820s and 1830s, southern writers and politicians stopped apologizing for slavery and began to promote it as the ideal social arrangement. Chiefly through English experience, and from English and classical writers, the agrarian myth came to America, where, like so many other cultural importations, it eventually took on altogether new dimensions in its new setting. In the very hours of its birth as a nation Crveceur had congratulated America for having, in effect, no feudal past and no industrial present, for having no royal, aristocratic, ecclesiastical, or monarchial power, and no manufacturing class, and had rapturously concluded: We are the most perfect society now existing in the world. Here was the irony from which the farmer suffered above all others: the United States was the only country in the world that began with perfection and aspired to progress. 20-49 people 29733 Many of them expected that the great empty inland regions would guarantee the preponderance of the yeomanand therefore the dominance of Jeffersonianism and the health of the statefor an unlimited future. Large groups of slaves worked from sunrise to sunset under a white overseer. Abolition. So appealing were the symbols of the myth that even an arch-opponent of the agrarian interest like Alexander Hamilton found it politic to concede in his Report on Manufactures that the cultivation of the earth, as the primary and most certain source of national supply has intrinsically a strong claim to pre-eminence over every other kind of industry. And Benjamin Franklin, urban cosmopolite though he was, once said that agriculture was the only honest way for a nation to acquire wealth, wherein man receives a real increase of the seed thrown into the ground, a kind of continuous miracle, wrought by the hand of God in his favour, as a reward for his innocent life and virtuous industry. These farmers practiced a "safety first" form of subsistence agriculture by growing a wide range of crops in small amounts so that the needs of their families were met first. Bryan spoke for a people raised for generations on the idea that the farmer was a very special creature, blessed by God, and that in a country consisting largely of farmers the voice of the farmer was the voice of democracy and of virtue itself. Even when the circumstances were terrible and morale and support in his army was. Agrarian sentiment sanctified labor in the soil and the simple life; but the prevailing Calvinist atmosphere of rural life implied that virtue was rewarded with success and material goods. A quarter of Mississippis yeoman households contained at least 8 members, and many included upward of 10. Writers like Thomas Jefferson and Hector St. John de Crveceur admired the yeoman farmer not for his capacity to exploit opportunities and make money but for his honest industry, his independence, his frank spirit of equality, his ability to produce and enjoy a simple abundance. Yeoman, in English history, a class intermediate between the gentry and the labourers; a yeoman was usually a landholder but could also be a retainer, guard, attendant, . In the Populist era the city was totally alien territory to many farmers, and the primacy of agriculture as a source of wealth was reasserted with much bitterness. Elsewhere the rural classes had usually looked to the past, had been bearers of tradition and upholders of stability. Sewing or mending, gardening, dairying, tending to poultry, and carrying water were just some of the labors in which women and children engaged almost daily, along with spinning, weaving, washing, canning, candle or soap making, and other tasks that occurred less often. All through the great Northwest, farmers whose lathers might have lived in isolation and sell-sufficiency were surrounded by jobbers, banks, stores, middlemen, horses, and machinery. Before long he was cultivating the prairies with horse- drawn mechanical reapers, steel plows, wheat and corn drills, and threshers. By completely abolishing slavery. The more farming as a self-sufficient way of life was abandoned for farming as a business, the more merit men found in what was being left behind. White Southerners supported slavery for a variety of reasons. In goes the dentists naturalization efforts: next the witching curls are lashioned to her classically molded head. Then the womanly proportions are properly adjusted: hoops, bustles, and so forth, follow in succession, then a proluse quantity of whitewash, together with a permanent rose tint is applied to a sallow complexion: and lastly thekilling wrapper is arranged on her systematical and matchless form. The opening of the trails-Allegheny region, its protection from slavery, and the purchase of the Louisiana Territory were the first great steps in a continental strategy designed to establish an internal empire of small farms. Copyright 1949-2022 American Heritage Publishing Co. All Rights Reserved. "Why Non-Slaveholders Fought for the Confederacy" Historian Greg Downs describes the motivations that drove non-slaveholding white Southerners to fight for the Confederacy and to protect slavery. Why did poor white farmers identify more closely with slaveowners than with enslaved African Americans? Within the community, fistfights, cockfights, and outright drunken brawls helped to establish or maintain a mans honor and social standing relative to his peers. The growth of the urban market intensified this antagonism. Remember that. 32 Why did the yeoman farmers support slavery? Slavery. They were suspicious of the state bank and supported President Jacksons dismantling of the Second Bank of the United States. Cheap land invited extensive and careless cultivation. For the articulate people were drawn irresistibly to the noncommercial, non-pecuniary, self-sufficient aspect of American farm life. They attended balls, horse races, and election days. Some writers used it to give simple, direct, and emotional expression to their feelings about life and nature; others linked agrarianism with a formal philosophy of natural rights. However, just like so many of the hundreds of . So the savings from his selfsulficiency went into improvementsinto the purchase of more land, of herds and flocks, of better tools; they went into the building of barns and silos and better dwellings. To what extent was the agrarian myth actually false? Before the Civil War, many yeomen had concentrated on raising food crops and instead of cash crops like cotton. Mississippis yeomen also cultivated large amounts of peas, sweet potatoes, and other foodstuffs and kept herds of livestock, especially pigs. 10. They must be carefully manicured, with none of the hot, brilliant shades ol nail polish. Since the yeoman was believed to be both happy and honest, and since he had a secure propertied stake in society in the form of his own land, he was held to be the best and most reliable sort of citizen. Since the time of Locke it had been a standard argument that the land is the common stock of society to which every man has a rightwhat Jefferson called the fundamental right to labour the earth; that since the occupancy and use of land are the true criteria of valid ownership, labor expended in cultivating the earth confers title to it; that since government was created to protect property, the property of working landholders has a special claim to be fostered and protected by the state. The Texas Revolution, started in part by Anglo-American settlers seeking to preserve slavery after Mexico had abolished it, and its subsequent annexation by the U.S. as a state led to a flurry of criticism by Northerners against those they saw as putting the interests of slavery over those of the country as a whole. These same values made yeomen farmers central to the republican vision of the new nation. Were located primarily in the backcountry. However, southern White yeoman farmers generally did not support an active federal government. Wealthy slave owners needed slaves to keep them wealthy. If you feel like you're hearing more about . Although the Civil War had exacted a toll on the lives and livelihoods of Mississippis yeomanry, the most pronounced shift in this way of life occurred between 1880 and 1910. After the war these farmers found themselves deep in debt, often with buildings destroyed and lands untended. Please support this 72-year tradition of trusted historical writing and the volunteers that sustain it with a donation to American Heritage. See answer (1) Best Answer. If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked. Rather than finding common cause with African Americans, white farmers aspired to earn enough money to purchase their own slaves and climb the social and economic ladder. Slavery affected the yeomen in a negative way, because the yeomen were only able to produce a small amount of crops whereas the slaves that belong to the wealthy plantation owners were able to produce a mass amount, leaving the yeomen with very little profit. - Produced 10% of the nation's manufactured goods Why did yeoman farmers, who couldn't afford slaves, still support the cause for slavery? In those three decades, the number of Mississippians living in cities or towns nearly tripled, while the keeping of livestock, particularly pigs, declined precipitously. The sheer abundance of the landthat very internal empire that had been expected to insure the predominance of the yeoman in American life for centuriesgave the coup de grce to the yeomanlike way of life. History/Historical. Demographic factors both contributed to and reveal the end of independent farming life. While the farmer had long since ceased to act like a yeoman, he was somewhat slower in ceasing to think like one. Direct link to David Alexander's post Slaves were people, and l, Posted 3 years ago. How were Southern yeoman farmers affected by the civil war? Planters with numerous slaves had work that was essentially managerial, and often they supervised an overseer rather than the slaves themselves. Why Do Cross Country Runners Have Skinny Legs? The early American politician, the country editor, who wished to address himself to the common man, had to draw upon a rhetoric that would touch the tillers of the soil; and even the spokesman of city people knew that his audience had been in very large part reared upon the farm. To them it was an ideal. For while early American society was an agrarian society, it was last becoming more commercial, and commercial goals made their way among its agricultural classes almost as rapidly as elsewhere. The old man at left says God Bless you massa! At the beginning of the Nineteenth Century, when the American population was still living largely in the forests and most of it was east of the Appalachians, the yeoman farmer did exist in large numbers, living much as the theorists of the agrarian myth portrayed him. At first the agrarian myth was a notion of the educated classes, but by the early Nineteenth Century it had become a mass creed, a part of the countrys political folklore and its nationalist ideology. Indeed, as slaveholders came to face a three-front assault on slavery - from northern abolitionists and free-soilers, the enslaved themselves, and poor white southerners - they realized they had few viable options left. It was clearly formulated and almost universally accepted in America during the last half of the Eighteenth Century. Free subscription>>, Please consider a donation to help us keep this American treasure alive. Although three-quarters of the white population of the South did not own any enslaved people, a culture of white supremacy ensured that poor whites identified more with rich slaveholders than with enslaved African Americans. Support with a donation>>. I paste this one here to show you how little political argumentation has changed in 160 years: "JAMES THORNWELL, a minister, wrote in 1860, "The parties in this conflict are not merely Abolitionists and slaveholders, they are Atheists, Socialists, Communists, Red Republicans, Jacobins on the one side and the friends of order and regulated freedom on the other.". The prolonged wars with the Persians and other peoples provided many slaves, but . To call it a myth is not to imply that the idea is simply false. Because he lived in close communion with beneficent nature, his life was believed to have a wholesomeness and integrity impossible for the depraved populations of cities. . American chattel slavery was a unique institution that emerged in the English colonies in America in the seventeenth century. . Their Moreover, when good times returned alter the Populist revolt of the 1890s, businessmen and bankers and the agricultural colleges began to woo the farmer, to make efforts to persuade him to take the businesslike view of himself that was warranted by the nature of his farm operations. Moreover, the editors and politicians who so flattered them need not in most cases have been insincere. There has a certain class of individuals grown up in our land, complained a farm writer in 1835, who treat the cultivators of the soil as an inferior caste whose utmost abilities are confined to the merit of being able to discuss a boiled potato and a rasher of bacon. The city was symbolized as the home of loan sharks, dandies, lops, and aristocrats with European ideas who despised farmers as hayseeds. Many secessionists pointed out that this law was meant to protect property rights, but that multiple northern states were attempting to nullify it (Document 2, p. 94), thereby attacking southern rights in addition to the . Direct link to delong.dylan's post why did this happen, Posted 2 years ago. Some were heroes, some were scoundrels, and many perished far from home. Congress did not have the power to bar slavery from any territory. The failure of the Homestead Act to enact by statute the leesimple empire was one of the original sources of Populist grievances, and one of the central points at which the agrarian myth was overrun by the commercial realities. The Jeffersonians appealed again and again to the moral primacy of the yeoman farmer in their attacks on the Federalists. Slavery still exists, Posted a month ago. . Much later the Homestead Act was meant to carry to its completion the process of continental settlement by small homeowners. The vast majority of slaveholders owned fewer than five people. The rise of native industry created a home market for agriculture, while demands arose abroad for American cotton and foodstuffs, and a great network of turnpikes, canals, and railroads helped link the planter and the advancing western farmer to the new markets. Nothing to wear, eat, or drink was purchased, as my farm provided all. Defenders of slavery argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance on slave labor was the foundation of their economy. He became a businessman in fact long before lie began to regard himself in this light. The yeoman families lived much more isolated lives than their counterparts in the North and, because of their chronic shortage of cash, lacked many of the amenities that northerners enjoyed. Yeoman farmers from the plantation belt relied on planters for parts of the cotton selling process since they couldnt afford gins. Since the time of Locke it had been a standard argument that the land is the common stock of society to which every man has a rightwhat Jefferson called the fundamental right to labour the earth; that since the occupancy and use of land are the true criteria of valid ownership, labor expended in cultivating the earth confers title to it; that since government was created to protect property, the property of working landholders has a special claim to be fostered and protected by the state. Here was the significance of sell-sufficiency for the characteristic family farmer. Even farm boys were taught to strive for achievement in one form or another, and when this did not take them away from the farms altogether, it impelled them to follow farming not as a way of life but as a carrer that is, as a way of achieving substantial success. In 1840, John C. Calhoun wrote that it is a great and dangerous error to suppose that all people are equally entitled to liberty. days remains a powerful force. The object of farming, declared a writer in the Cornell Countryman in 1904, is not primarily to make a living, but it is to make money. 9. As the farmer moved out of the forests onto the flat, rich prairies, he found possibilities for machinery that did not exist in the forest. During the 1850's, pro-slavery arguments from the pulpit became especially strident. Merchants, and Slaves The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism Back to Work Korean Modernization and Uneven Development The King's Three Faces Leaders, Leadership, And U.s. Policy In Latin America Eastern Europe in the Postwar World The Environment Illinois Armed Forces, Conflict, And Change In Africa Theories of Development, Second Edition - Reason: Aspirational reasons, racism inherent to the system gave even the poorest whites legal and social status How did slave owners view themselves? He concentrated on the cash crop, bought more and more of his supplies from the country store. It took a strong man to resist the temptation to ride skyward on lands that might easily triple or quadruple their value in one decade and then double in the next. They were independent and sellsufficient, and they bequeathed to their children a strong love of craltsmanlike improvisation and a firm tradition of household industry. The Tower Guard take part in the three daily ceremonies: the Ceremonial Opening, the Ceremony of the Word and the Ceremony of the Keys. But no longer did he grow or manufacture almost everything he needed. The American slave system rested heavily on the nature of this balance of power. His well-being was not merely physical, it was moral; it was not merely personal, it was the central source of civic virtue; it was not merely secular but religious, for God had made the land and called man to cultivate it. The sheer abundance of the landthat very internal empire that had been expected to insure the predominance of the yeoman in American life for centuriesgave the coup de grce to the yeomanlike way of life. To take full advantage of the possibilities of mechanization, he engrossed as much land as he could and borrowed money for his land and machinery. In the early Archaic period the elite worked its estates with the labour of fellow citizens in bondage (often for debt). The shift from self-sufficient to commercial farming varied in time throughout the West and cannot be dated with precision, but it was complete in Ohio by about 1830 and twenty years later in Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan. Direct link to 2725ahow's post slaves were a bad thing, Posted 3 months ago. Posted 3 years ago. In 1860 a farm journal satirized the imagined refinements and affectations of a city in the following picture: Slowly she rises from her couch. As settlement moved west, as urban markets grew, as self-sufficient farmers became rarer, as farmers pushed into commercial production for the cities they feared and distrusted, they quite correctly thought of themselves as a vocational and economic group rather than as members of a neighborhood. Its hero was the yeoman farmer, its central conception the notion that he is the ideal man and the ideal citizen. Still more important, the myth played a role in the first party battles under the Constitution. 37 . To log in and use all the features of Khan Academy, please enable JavaScript in your browser. Offering what seemed harmless flattery to this numerically dominant class, the myth suggested a standard vocabulary to rural editors and politicians. Slavery affected the yeomen in a negative way, because the yeomen were only able to produce a small amount of crops whereas the slaves that belong to the wealthy plantation owners were able to produce a mass amount, leaving the yeomen with very little profit.. What was the significance of yeoman farmers? So the savings from his selfsulficiency went into improvementsinto the purchase of more land, of herds and flocks, of better tools; they went into the building of barns and silos and better dwellings. There survives from the Jackson era a painting that shows Governor Joseph Ritner of Pennsylvania standing by a primitive plow at the end of a furrow. There survives from the Jackson era a painting that shows Governor Joseph Ritner of Pennsylvania standing by a primitive plow at the end of a furrow. Read more >>, The magazine was forced to suspend print publication in 2013, but a group of volunteers saved the archives and relaunched it in digital form in 2017. The notion of an innocent and victimized populace colors the whole history of agrarian controversy. The 14th century also witnessed the rise of the yeoman longbow archer during the Hundred Years' War, and the yeoman outlaws celebrated in the Robin Hood ballads. Rising land values in areas of new settlement tempted early liquidation and frequent moves, frequent and sensational rises in land values bred a boom psychology in the American farmer and caused him to rely for his margin of profit more on the appreciation in the value of his land than on the sale of crops. For the yeomanry, avoiding debt, the greatest threat to a familys long-term independence, was both an economic and religious imperative, so the speculation in land and slaves required to compete in the market economy was rare. Though slaves used a variety of musical instruments, they also engaged in the practice of patting juba or the clapping of hands in a highly complex and rhythmic fashion. one of a class of lesser freeholders, below the gentry, who cultivated their own land, early admitted in England to political rights. How did many of the founders. Does slavery still exist in some parts of the world? Did not enslave any people 1042575, Wealthy slaveowners devoted their time to leisure and consumption. 2022 - 2023 Times Mojo - All Rights Reserved In addition, many yeomen purchased, rented, borrowed, or inherited slaves, but slavery was neither the primary source of labor nor a very visible part of the landscape in Mississippis antebellum hill country. The most common instance used to support this was the, in the southern opinion, disregard for the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850. Why did yeoman farmers largely support slavery (list two reasons)? Those forests, which provided materials for early houses and barns, sources of fish and game, and places for livestock to root or graze, together with the fields in between, which were better suited to growing corn than cotton, befitted the yeomanry, who yearned for independence and self-sufficiency. The shift from self-sufficient to commercial farming varied in time throughout the West and cannot be dated with precision, but it was complete in Ohio by about 1830 and twenty years later in Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan. Jefferson saw it to be more beneficial to buy the territory from France than to stay with his ideals in this situation. Like any complex of ideas, the agrarian myth cannot be defined in a phrase, but its component themes form a clear pattern. In origin the agrarian myth was not a popular but a literary idea, a preoccupation of the upper classes, of those who enjoyed a classical education, read pastoral poetry, experimented with breeding stock, and owned plantations or country estates. There has a certain class of individuals grown up in our land, complained a farm writer in 1835, who treat the cultivators of the soil as an inferior caste whose utmost abilities are confined to the merit of being able to discuss a boiled potato and a rasher of bacon. The city was symbolized as the home of loan sharks, dandies, lops, and aristocrats with European ideas who despised farmers as hayseeds. Rising land values in areas of new settlement tempted early liquidation and frequent moves, frequent and sensational rises in land values bred a boom psychology in the American farmer and caused him to rely for his margin of profit more on the appreciation in the value of his land than on the sale of crops. Yesterday, United teased us with this spot: In reality, these intellectual defenses of slavery bore little or no resemblance to the lived experience of enslaved people, who were subject to a brutal and dehumanizing system that was every bit as profit-driven as northern industry. view (saw) slavery? In Mississippi, yeoman farming culture predominated in twenty-three counties in the northwest and central parts [] The farmer knew that without cash he could never rise above the hardships and squalor of pioneering and log-cabin life. Rather the myth so effectively embodies mens values that it profoundly influences their way of perceiving reality and hence their behavior. Fenced areas surround gardens and a large house sits near many outbuildings, including a cotton press. held as slaves or hostages, and others led foreign armies into battle. It was the late of the farmer himself to contribute to this decline. To take full advantage of the possibilities of mechanization, he engrossed as much land as he could and borrowed money for his land and machinery. Instead, yeoman farmers devoted the majority of their efforts to producing food, clothing, and other items used at home. you feed and clothe us. A learned agricultural gentry, coming into conflict with the industrial classes, welcomed the moral strength that a rich classical ancestry brought to the praise of husbandry. Members of this class did not own landsome of the . He was becoming increasingly an employer of labor, and though he still worked with his hands, he began to look with suspicion upon the working classes of the cities, especially those organized in trade unions, as he had once done upon the urban lops and aristocrats.