I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. Hopefully, one of the above solutions help you fix Ventoy if its not working, or youre experiencing booting issues. legacy - ok Besides, I'm considering that: I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. what is the working solution? Newbie. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Using Ventoy-1.0.08, ubuntudde-20.04-amd64-desktop.iso is still unable to boot under uefi. Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. plist file using ProperTree. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? [issue]: ventoy can't boot any iso on Dell Inspiron 3558, but can boot Click Bootable > Load Boot File. Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. Have a question about this project? they reviewed all the source code). Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. Same issue with 1.0.09b1. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. And that is the right thing to do. Thanks! using the direct ISO download method on MS website. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. Delete or rename the \EFI folder on the VTOYEFI partition 2 of the Ventoy drive. Getting the same error as @rderooy. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce Yes ! The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. Error message: MediCAT Latest Ventoy release introduces experimental IMG format support My guesd is it does not. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:25 PM Steve Si ***@***. When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. all give ERROR on my PC for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. maybe that's changed, or perhaps if there's a setting somewhere to Follow the urls bellow to clone the git repository. When the user select option 1. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. Yet, that is technically what Ventoy does if you enrol it for Secure Boot, as it makes it look like any bootloader, that wasn't signed by Microsoft, was signed by Microsoft. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. privacy statement. For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. I checked and they don't work. Please follow the guid bellow. Well occasionally send you account related emails. debes activar modo legacy en el bios-uefi How to Create a Multiboot USB With Ventoy - MUO - Technology, Simplified. What system are you booting from? function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. Won't it be annoying? There are many kinds of WinPE. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. It woks only with fallback graphic mode. Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. 4. ext2fsd Porteus-CINNAMON-v4.0-x86_64.iso - 321 MB, APorteus-MULTI-v20.03.19-x86_64.iso - 400 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-32_Beta-1.2.iso - 1.92 GB, Paragon_Hard_Disk_Manager_15_Premium_10.1.25.1137_WinPE_x64.iso - 514 MB, pureos-9.0-plasma-live_20200328-amd64.hybrid.iso - 1.65 GB, pfSense-CE-2.4.5-RELEASE-amd64.iso - 738 MB, FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200319-r359106-disc1.iso - 928 MB, wifislax64-1.1-final.iso - 2.18 GB @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Copyright Windows Report 2023. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. I'm unable to boot my Windows 10 installer USB in UEFI mode?